What has become of Dogecoin?

The crypto scene is known for its fast pace – new blockchain projects are springing up like mushrooms, other stars in the crypto sky are burning up just as fast as they have risen. In our series “What has become of …?” we want to deal with projects at regular intervals that have become a bit quieter recently. We want to find out what the current status is like and whether we might hear more about the topic again in the future.

Today we resurrect an old favourite of the crypto scene: Bitcoin loophole

When the Bitcoin loophole White Paper was first published in 2008, very few people suspected that it would become a model for many other Bitcoin loophole crypto currencies within a good five years. As one of the first so-called Altcoins Litecoin presented itself as “the silver to Bitcoins Gold”, others also oriented themselves to the Bitcoin blockchain and set up crypto projects. This veritable boom also attracted jokers from the early crypto scene who wanted to take the entire ecosystem a little by surprise. For this purpose they founded their own crypto currency: Dogecoin.

“Much wow”
Dogecoin – DOGE for short – was actually conceived as a pure parody of Bitcoin, Litecoin and the general hype, which seems almost ridiculous from today’s point of view. Since the coin, however, like all other listed crypto currencies, was freely tradable, krypton users soon began to trade it as well. So he quickly developed into one of those Altcoins to whom he was supposed to hold the mirror. Nevertheless, his special use case and some funny features made him stand out from the gray Altcoin crowd.

Dogecoin orientates himself on the above mentioned crypto currency Litecoin. Like this one, the coin uses the Proof of Work as a mining algorithm, albeit with the much faster block production time of one minute per block. The comic-like character of the crypto currency is underlined by the icon. Based on the Internet phenomenon Doge, which circulated at the time and gives its name to the crypto currency, a Shiba adorns the front of the coin. The Japanese dog breed was and is a popular motif for memes with captions like “Much…”. “Search…” or “Wow.”

Why so serious?
After the new coin immediately enjoyed immense popularity, it belonged to the largest listed crypto currencies only a few weeks after its foundation in December 2013. Within only two weeks, DOGE was in 15th place on Coinmarketcap, after a good two months the Coin had made it into the Top 5 for the first time. The market capitalisation was more than 60 million US dollars. By mid-2016, the coin had actually managed to stay in the top 10. After that, however, it went rapidly downhill.

In January 2017 DOGE flew out of the top 15 for the first time again. This was less due to the declining popularity of the coin itself – Dogecoin’s market capitalisation remained largely constant over the course of the year – but rather to the overall development of the crypto market. Led by Bitcoin and Ethereum, the crypto business became increasingly mature and serious – no more room for a fun coin. In the age of DAOs and smart contracts, Dogecoin simply lacks the use case in order to continue to play a role – regardless of the hard core that remains loyal to the crypto currency.

Is there still a future for the news spy?

Already in February 2017 we asked the news spy: https://www.forexaktuell.com/en/the-news-spy-scam/ “Is the old dog still alive? In fact, the dog in question made a few jumps afterwards. So the coin once again managed to clearly outperform the old record in terms of market capitalization. At the beginning of January, at the record point of the crypto market, he even briefly broke the 2 billion US dollar barrier. In view of the market situation, however, it was only just below the top 30 coins. At the moment it still ranks in the top 50.

On the other hand, Dogecoin will be a market player in the foreseeable future. The developer team around Billy Markus and Jackson Palmer has not carried out a system update for more than two years. At the moment there are also no signs that this could change in the near future. The Dogecoin simply lacks the technological basis to offer users in the modern market an added value. It does not go beyond simply parodying the Bitcoin. Thus the coin will remain tradable – but it will probably not write any more crypto history.

Posted in Dogecoin | Leave a comment

BitPay or Coinbase? Shopify gives merchants the choice

Shopify Managing Director Louis Kearns justified the decision to bring both companies on board with the fact that the dealers now have the opportunity to choose between one of the two suppliers depending on their needs.

The European Commission has announced a deal with the Bitcoin payment processor Coinbase. This gives another 70,000 merchants the opportunity to accept Bitcoin as a means of payment in the future.

In November of last year, Shopify chose BitPay as its Bitcoin payment processor. Now merchants can choose between one of the two leading providers.

Shopify CEO Louis Kearns justified the decision to bring both companies on board with the fact that merchants now have the option to choose between one of the two providers depending on their needs.

Kearns said about cryptosoft:

“By partnering with the two companies, we are stimulating innovation which will ultimately benefit customers. At the same time, it is of course a great development for cryptosoft and the Bitcoin as a whole”. Read more on: https://www.geldplus.net/en/cryptosoft-review/

On the Shopify homepage, the user will find detailed instructions on how to integrate the two providers into the online shop.

Coinbase took the initiative
Kearns pointed out that he strongly believes he can improve service to customers with a second service provider and that Coinbase had taken the initiative to develop the Shopify integration tool independently. Once the tool was complete, Shopfiy only needed to approve it and release it to customers.

Kearns explained crypto trader:

“We offer an open source crypto trader platform for the integration of different payment methods. This gives crypto trader companies like Coinbase the ability to develop their own Shopify integration and get it up and running. Coinbase took the initiative and developed such an integration”.

As a result, merchants can now test both vendors before finally choosing a payment processor.

Extension of Shopify functions
Kearns also justified the introduction of Coinbase with the fact that the demand for this special Bitcoin payment processor was constantly present due to the different features of both platforms.

Kearns anticipates that the new offering will attract more Shopify merchants and increase Bitcoin’s popularity and acceptance:

“Both companies have a special segment in which they are the dominant market leaders. Coinbase, for example, is more focused on the US mark and the user needs an American bank account to exchange Bitcoin for Fiat currencies. BitPay, on the other hand, focuses more on the international market.”

As shown on the Shopify website, both companies offer different pricing models. BiPay charged a transaction fee of one percent for standard sales and zero percent for users with a monthly subscription. Coinbase, on the other hand, does not charge a transaction fee until the customer has reached USD 1 million in revenue.

Building on success
Although Kearn doesn’t give any official figures, he did point out that Shopify has seen a steady growth in Bitcoin payments and that several BTC payments with a total value of “several million US dollars” have already been processed.

The key to success are high-profile Bitcoin companies and enthusiasts. The Hip Hop artist, for example, uses 50 cents to sell textiles and accept Bitcoin.

Posted in BitPay | Leave a comment

WTO Blockchain Report: A Festival of Conjunctives

Can Blockchain technology revolutionize world trade? The World Trade Organization (WTO), based in Geneva, has investigated this question in a recently published book. The book, written by Emmanuelle Ganne, was published at a blockchain workshop held on 27 November.

The fact that the World Trade Organization also has the issue of blockchain on its agenda was shown in the World Trade Report 2018 published in October at the latest. According to this report, the WTO counts blockchain and other distributed ledger technologies among the “big four” technologies that can significantly change world trade. The WHO held a blockchain workshop in Geneva on 27 November on what these changes could consist of. On the occasion of the workshop, WHO published a report entitled “Can Blockchain revolutionize international trade?

Main problems: Interoperability and regulation of the Bitcoin revolution

On the technical side, the lack of interoperability (and scalability) of the Bitcoin revolution remains the main obstacle to the full development of the technology’s potential according to the review by onlinebetrug: “In particular, technical solutions must be developed to address the problem of the ‘digital island’ and to ensure that blockchains can communicate with each other”.

The report analyses possible application areas of the technology in international trade. The focus is on paperless commerce, copyright issues, new services in finance and e-commerce, and government procurement management. The author of the analysis is Emmanuelle Ganne, Vice President of the Allam Advisory Group. The almost 150-page report contains little that is new – but a lot of statements of the kind “Hätte, könnte, sollte” (Had, could, should). Ganne emphasizes the much-vaunted potential of blockchain technology, but also points to the technical and regulatory hurdles that still need to be overcome.

Moreover, there is still a lack of a global regulatory framework for the Bitcoin revolution:

“The broad use of blockchain requires an appropriate legal framework that recognises the legal validity of Bitcoin revolution transactions, clarifies applicable law and obligations, and regulates how Bitcoin revolution data can be accessed and used,

Ganne notes. It is by no means certain, however, that this will ever happen. This applies in particular to Permissionless Blockchains, where there is no de facto (and de jure) contact for regulatory authorities. An example: to whom should the German government turn in order to force the Bitcoin Protocol into a regulatory concept? Exactly. The situation is different with private or “enterprise blockchains”, for example, which are the focus of IBM’s Hyperledger.

In order to overcome these hurdles, close cooperation between all parties involved is required:

“Given the potential of blockchain, companies, civil society organisations, software developers, academics, governments and intergovernmental organisations should work hand in hand to assess the practical and legal implications of the technology and develop common solutions to existing challenges.

If this ambitious goal is achieved, world trade could undergo “radical” change in ten to 15 years.

Posted in regulation | Leave a comment

Blockchain platform for application documents

A further, time-consuming expenditure consists with the housing search of sending each time anew its documents to the housing company or the broker. A blockchain solution would also be helpful here – there are already functioning practical examples.

On the one hand, a blockchain platform based on the Estonian model would be conceivable. Here, within a decentralised network (the so-called X-Road), all data of the inhabitants are stored, so that everyone with the corresponding digital signature, for example a civil servant, has access to the respective data, without constantly having to fill out and send new forms.

X-Road using the news spy as an example:

Such a platform could work in a similar way for the news spy housing market. All housing associations and estate agents could be equipped with a key that gives them the right to access a platform where the application documents are stored.

As a result, the housing application documents would only have to be uploaded once. Also here a digital signature with an individual Hash can be provided for each document and be tracked over the Bitcoin or Ethereum Blockchain. This form of document certification could well be done with Stampery, which is already available as an add-in for Microsoft Office and runs on both the Bitcoin and Ethereum block chains.

How realistic is that Bitcoin secret?

From a technical point of view, the scenarios presented above are quite realistic. Nevertheless, there is little hope in the short to medium term that housing associations will equip their homes with intelligent locks or implement other Bitcoin secret blockchain solutions, which are not a Bitcoin secret scam.

There is no economic incentive because the apartments will find a tenant one way or the other, even if the estate agent is no longer on site. The brokerage companies would have to bear additional costs due to the conversion as well as the effort to communicate the new technology comprehensibly both internally and externally.

In addition, the profession of broker or mediator, which is already being called into question by digitalisation, would be further in need of explanation. The question of what housing brokers are needed for, if even the doors can be opened automatically via Smart Contracts, would become an even more important topic of discussion.

The conflict of interest, the usual scepticism towards new technologies and economic reasons are currently preventing a rapid blockchain rollout in the brokerage business.

Before intelligent locks become part of everyday life, some time will probably pass before the use cases have been better researched and blockchain usability has matured further.

Posted in solutions | Leave a comment

M&A in the crypto sector – is the big takeover poker about to begin?

In addition to numerous cooperations that are concluded every week between blockchain start-ups, banks, corporations and IT service providers, the business with takeovers is also slowly picking up speed.

Is this a Bitcoin secret or a general trend affecting the cryptoscene?

The largest American crypto exchange, Coinbase, which recently acquired three financial service providers, has come into particular focus. The Bitcoin secret takes over Keystone Capital, Venovate Marketplace and Digital Wealth. With the takeover of the companies, Coinbase will also receive licenses as a broker, provider of alternative trading systems (over-the-counter trading) and investment advisor. In particular, Coinbase’s authorization to operate alternative Bitcoin secret trading systems facilitates the creation of a trading platform for security tokens. The situation is similar with the announcement that the Litecoin Foundation has acquired 9.9 percent of WEG Bank AG – the motives should be similar.

The question of why
The incentives for acquisitions and share purchases are therefore obvious. Crypto start-ups need licenses in order to get involved in the financial sector. It is precisely these licenses that regulated financial service providers can offer. Due to the increasing regulatory pressure, crypto start-ups are increasingly being urged to create the infrastructure and regulatory prerequisites to fully operate their business.

Anyone who has the necessary small change will try to take a shortcut, i.e. buy in licenses and infrastructures, instead of laboriously applying for and building them up. But one thing must also be clear: Just because a crypto start-up acquires a financial service provider equipped with licenses is not enough to make it a free ticket to subsequently conduct business at will. The authorities can still veto the decision even if they do not agree with the new business plans.

Vice Versa in the cryptosoft business?

But what about the opposite case – are there also established financial service providers that participate in crypto start-ups? In contrast to start-ups from the Bitcoin cryptosoft ecosystem, traditional financial service providers often lack innovative ideas: https://www.forexaktuell.com/en/cryptosoft-scam/ It is precisely here that strategic acquisitions of crypto start-ups could secure the survival of financial service providers. Those who do not develop further will sooner or later be forced out of the market. This knowledge is also gaining ground in the otherwise rather conservative financial sector.

So it is not surprising that Goldman Sachs, for example, is involved in Circle. It can be assumed that established financial service providers will also secure shares in promising crypto companies in the future. Instead of acquiring licenses, financial service providers are thus acquiring innovations that they would otherwise have to develop or build themselves very laboriously.

Is the poker game already in full swing?
As meaningful as the M&A business may be from a strategic point of view in both directions, we are still at the beginning of development. The crypto economy is still in its infancy and is often far from being commercially successful or offering practicable solutions. It can therefore be assumed that not only the usability of the crypto products must be further optimized, but also the interfaces to other IT infrastructures. In addition, the continuing lack of clarity in regulation is preventing many financial service providers from investing more in the industry.

The more the start-ups in the blockchain and crypto area develop, the more the M&A business will pick up speed. After all, financial service providers want to buy functioning use cases and not unprofitable idea workshops that might eventually be successful.

On the other hand, for crypto start-ups it often only makes sense to buy in financial service providers when they have the necessary small change and their products or services have sufficient market maturity to be commercially successful.

Posted in Crypto start-ups | Leave a comment

Blockchain.com announces support for Airdrops

The world’s largest wallet provider Blockchain.com is planning the launch of an Airdrop extension. In the future, token developers will be able to reach the nearly 30 million wallets for Airdrops. The company announced this in a recently published white paper.

Airdrops are a proven means of distributing new tokens. Without users having to buy the new coins, mine them or make any other efforts, they are provided with free tokens by the publisher. What at first sounds like a rather airy number has good reasons: Token-based networks build on a certain network size. This means that a network can only be used with a sufficient number of users. Airdrops are therefore a convenient way of achieving the necessary distribution of tokens at a stroke. The white paper states:

“Airdrops are good for those who want their token-based networks to flourish. Airdrops can quickly and effectively decentralize these networks and increase their usability through network effects.

Active monitoring by Bitcoin revolution scam

So can wallet owners look forward to a real rain of money? Rather like this: Is Bitcoin Revolution a Scam? Read This Review Before You Sign Up!. The company strives for an active monitoring of the Airdrops and advertises with high quality demands on the implementation. Only those projects that are designed as follows can qualify for the Bitcoin revolution scam programme:

The Airdrop should be addressed directly to the Bitcoin loophole scam

It should be aimed at a broad user base and onlinebetrug says it is scam. The distribution should be free and fair. The focus should be on the purpose of the token and not on the price increase. Airdrops do not imply use. Since there is no need to invest in advance, Airdrops does not initially entail any financial risks for users. However, it is uncertain whether the Bitcoin loophole scam projects will ever result in concrete benefits.

“Free money” actually doesn’t sound bad. But Airdrops are above all one thing: a clever PR gag. Because the underlying calculation is, besides the decentralization of the network, simply to generate attention.

Whether or not the wallet users of Blockchain.com will be exposed to a flood of useless tokens in the future depends primarily on the company’s moderation.

Posted in Blockchain | Leave a comment

No concern about monetary policy

Because the value of all crypto tokens is low compared to the global money supply, monetary policy does not need to worry about their effectiveness at the moment. The President of the Bundesbank was sceptical about the issue of digital central bank money. Interest rates on digital money or the possibility of negative interest rates would expand the scope of monetary policy if private individuals were unable to switch to cash. But there is a “serious catch”: Digital central bank money could enter into direct competition with bank deposits. However, if commercial banks had to offer interest premiums to prevent bank deposits from being converted into digital central bank money, their margins in the deposit lending business would continue to fall, which could be problematic for financial stability.

Warning of digital banking storm

Weidmann sees an even greater risk in digital bank runs. If savings can be transferred to one’s own account at the central bank at the click of a mouse in order to flee the private financial system, the threshold for an onslaught on the banks would presumably be much lower than in the analogue world. Weidmann also cited an example of this: if not only Northern Rock’s customers but also those of other British banks had brought their flocks to the central bank in the UK in the crisis year 2007, they would have completely destabilized the entire banking system.

The President of the Bundesbank also referred to critics who have identified the possibility of money creation by commercial banks as a weak point of the current monetary system, because these are a major cause of harmful credit cycles. Historical experiences with a single-stage banking system and with central lending by the central bank were “sobering”, central administrative economies had shown that the state or the central bank were not the better bankers.

No competition for cash

Weidmann was convinced that the need for crypto tokens and digital central bank money would not arise if central banks were to keep payment transactions up to date with the latest technology. He was keen on the Eurosystem’s efforts to enable banks to make central bank money payments in real time by the end of the year. This would enable transfers between private individuals in a matter of seconds around the clock, every day of the year, regardless of which bank they have their account with.

Referring to Agustín Carstens, managing director of the Bank for International Settlements, who had described Bitcoin as a mixture of financial bubble, snowball system and environmental disaster, Weidmann said he did not think crypto currencies were at least a convincing alternative to state money:

“For a stable monetary and financial system we do not need crypto tokens, but central banks committed to price stability and effective bank regulation.

Gregor HallmannGregor Hallmann has been a business journalist for 20 years. As editor of a news agency, the studied political scientist closely followed the Internet boom and the subsequent bursting of the dotcom bubble around the turn of the millennium. Since then, as a freelance journalist, he has been writing critically about economics, finance and investment – and also has crypto currencies and block chains in mind.

Posted in bank regulation | Leave a comment